It included an opt-out clause for each side, and the owners exercised it in May There have been various issues discussed during the current negotiations, including the owners' push to increase the regular season from 16 games to 18; a rookie wage scale; and benefits for retired players.
Truly, though, the dispute centers on money: how to divide the billions in revenues, how much of that should go to owners off the top to cover certain costs, and the union's insistence on what it calls "financial transparency. And more: "We have a responsibility to our players - past, present, and future, to advance this league forward, not take 3 steps back.
The only missing member of the key league group was Patriots owner Robert Kraft, who is part of a delegation visiting Israel with Massachusetts Gov.
Deval Patrick. Obviously, we have the commitment. The only thing they've been committed to is a lockout. That is a reference to a court ruling last week, when the federal judge overseeing NFL labor matters sided with players in their case accusing owners of improperly negotiating TV deals to prepare for a work stoppage.
But for anyone to stand and turn to the American people and say they question that? The public acrimony between the sides temporarily had been tamped down in recent weeks, because mediator George Cohen asked the league and union to stay silent about the talks.
Getty Images. Slideshow: 10 Game-Changing Pro Sports Lockouts and Strikes There have been various issues discussed during the current negotiations, including the owners' push to increase the regular season from 16 games to 18; a rookie wage scale; and benefits for retired players.
On Thursday, the union complained that none of the owners met with any of the players on hand. Up until this past May, the NFL had little incentive to reach an agreement with the players, as it was awaiting what it believed to be a favorable legal decision from the U. Supreme Court in the case of American Needle v.
Had the NFL received a positive verdict in that case it would have a legal precedent that as a business it was a single entity and not a collection of 32 separate entities. This precedent would give the NFL a much stronger position against any claims brought against it under the antitrust laws.
Therefore, with the NFL having a significantly weaker position to defend itself against antitrust claims, the union is in the process of decertifying itself to move its potential legal battles from the jurisdiction of labor laws to those covering antitrust.
This move will transition the players from a union to a "trade organization" designed to prevent the NFL from locking the players out as it did back in Should the NFL attempt a lockout, the NFLPA could sue the league under antitrust laws that it was being subjected to a group boycott, which is illegal.
Factoring in the inevitable growth in annual revenue and franchise values, 1 percent is worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Although the leverage created by lopsided timelines is starkest in football, the same thing happened to the NBA players, whose salary cap has gone down by 6 percent in recent years to 51 percent of revenue. They have been through several, most notably sitting out the entire season to resist a salary cap.
And the players benefited, until But in , the players may have succumbed to the same pressures as the other sports. According to a article on fangraphs. In part, unions are meant to help the members obtain better benefits and working conditions. Unions also exist to protect their members from unfair labor practices.
Sports unions have made tremendous progress on both fronts. Counterintuitively, the owners benefit from the existence of a union as well.
The existence of unions allows leagues to operate under rules that are in violation of federal antitrust law, which is why decertifying has been the most impactful threat to leagues. In , with Junior Bridgeman as the lead plaintiff, players filed suit against the NBA, challenging what they considered antitrust violations such as imposing a draft and salary cap. When the players threatened to decertify, strengthening their case and exposing the league to massive damages, the NBA settled the case favorably for the players.
No settlement was reached, and in the players won McNeil v. They were awarded damages. In , the players attacked again. This time it was Reggie White v. That case led to the most substantial gains for football players in history. The league was without recourse in antitrust cases. So, as a condition of the settlement, the owners insisted that the players form a union. The players were thriving for years with an association, not a union. The league needed the protection the union provided more than the players.
One of the other cases at that time, Brown v. It went to the Supreme Court, where the core question was whether the league would maintain its labor exemptions if the two sides reached an impasse in negotiations. The court found in favor of the league, as it often did.
More on that later. Even if it had, it would have done no good before the Curt Flood Act of In , Flood, a black outfielder for the St. Louis Cardinals, challenged the restrictive reserve clause, which kept players from ever becoming free agents. Their rights belonged to the team that drafted them for their entire career, giving them no leverage to negotiate. After 12 years with the Cardinals, Flood was traded to Philadelphia.
0コメント